|
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH International Peer Reviewed & Refereed Journals, Open Access Journal ISSN Approved Journal No: 2455-2631 | Impact factor: 8.15 | ESTD Year: 2016 open access , Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor 8.15 |
Imp Links for Author
Imp Links for Reviewer
Research Area
Subscribe IJSDR
Visitor Counter
Copyright Infringement Claims
Indexing Partner
|
Published Paper Details
|
|
| Paper Title: | Comparison between Tubular Discectomy and Open Microdiscectomy surgery for Symptomatic Lumbar Disk Herniation |
| Authors Name: | Dr Sajag Kumar Gupta , Dr Mohd Faheem , Dr Hanuman prasad prajapati , Dr Anshul Galav , Dr Pankhudi Gupta |
| Unique Id: | IJSDR2308083 |
| Published In: | Volume 8 Issue 8, August-2023 |
| Abstract: | Objectives: There are many different minimally invasive procedures that can be used to treat lumbar disc herniation. In the management of lumbar disc herniation, Open microdiscectomy MD is the gold standard and is used as a benchmark for comparison with more recent techniques like tubular discectomy. The purpose of this study was to assess the complication rates of tubular discectomy and to compare the postoperative outcomes of individuals undergoing tubular discectomy with those undergoing MD. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 250 patients who underwent single-level lumbar discectomy either by tubular TD or MD between JULY 2017- JUNE 2022 was performed. The differences in the 2 groups' demographics, surgical length, intraoperative blood loss, overall hospital stay, pain score on the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score both before and after the procedure, and complications were assessed. Results: Out of the 250 patients, 130 patients were treated with MD and 120 by tubular disectomy TD. The mean age in MD and tubular TD group was 45.5 and 45.8 years. There was a improvement in VAS and ODI scores at 4 weeks in both the groups. There was a greater reduction of back pain in the TD group at 2 weeks compared to MD group but at 1 month both are comparable. Average surgical time was shorter in MD (71.6 min) as compared to TD group (80.2 min). the Average blood loss was higher (90.2 mL) in MD group as compared to TD group (35.8 mL) (Table 3 ). Length of incision as measured from the surgical scar was 1.7 cm in TD while it was 3.0 cm in MD group. Average hospital length of stay in TD (1.2 days) which was less than MD group (2.1 days). Likewise, MD group patients took 5.9 weeks to return to activity which was higher than the TD group (4.1 weeks). There were 9 cases (6.9%) of dural tear in MD and 10 cases (8.3%) in TD group. Conclusion: Sciatica caused by disc herniation can be effectively and safely treated with lumbar discectomy, whether it is TD or MD. In comparison to MD, the TD method for treating symptomatic lumbar radiculopathy is superior in that it causes less postoperative back pain, less blood loss, a shorter hospital stay, and a quicker return to work. Despite the learning curve, TD has been demonstrated to be a viable choice for treating lumbar disc herniation in patients who are carefully chosen. |
| Keywords: | lumbar disc, microdiscectomy , tubular discectomy , |
| Cite Article: | "Comparison between Tubular Discectomy and Open Microdiscectomy surgery for Symptomatic Lumbar Disk Herniation", International Journal of Science & Engineering Development Research (www.ijsdr.org), ISSN:2455-2631, Vol.8, Issue 8, page no.567 - 574, August-2023, Available :http://www.ijsdr.org/papers/IJSDR2308083.pdf |
| Downloads: | 000338719 |
| Publication Details: | Published Paper ID: IJSDR2308083 Registration ID:208158 Published In: Volume 8 Issue 8, August-2023 DOI (Digital Object Identifier): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8374118 Page No: 567 - 574 Publisher: IJSDR | www.ijsdr.org ISSN Number: 2455-2631 |
|
Click Here to Download This Article |
|
| Article Preview | |
|
|
|
Major Indexing from www.ijsdr.org
| Google Scholar | ResearcherID Thomson Reuters | Mendeley : reference manager | Academia.edu |
| arXiv.org : cornell university library | Research Gate | CiteSeerX | DOAJ : Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DRJI | Index Copernicus International | Scribd | DocStoc |
Track Paper
Important Links
Conference Proposal
ISSN
 |
 |
DOI (A digital object identifier)
  Providing A digital object identifier by DOI How to GET DOI and Hard Copy Related |
Open Access License Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
|
 |
 |
 |
Social Media
Indexing Partner |
|||
| Copyright © 2024 - All Rights Reserved - IJSDR | |||
Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn